About Me

My Photo
Lisbon, Portugal
I am an Assistant Professor at Lisbon University (Geology Department), and a research member of IDL-LATTEX lab. I started this blog when I caught the H1N1 flu and was forced to stay at home for one whole week. All opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.

Friday, September 16, 2011

I am not the only one!


I have just received an e-mail from a colleague of mine, suggesting me to change the title of this blog from “The Lisbon Structural Geologist” to “A Lisbon Structural Geologist”… Since I am obviously not the only structural geologist that lives and works in Lisbon, and since it is apparent that the former title could induce the readers in such a mistake, I have decided to change it in accordance.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Ken Robinson's view on this thing we call "education"

 
This video really deserves the little time it takes to watch, particularly if you are in some way connected to the activity we call “education”.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Reorganization

I obviously haven’t been able lately to maintain this blog, or to pay attention and read - as much as I would like to - other (geo) blogs.


A lot of other more important things got in the way. Among them: the end of my one year sabbatical license, the submission of one paper and the desperate attempt to submit another until the end of last July (before my summer vacations), a geo field trip in the Swiss Alps and, most important, the resume of my teaching activity at UL this semester.

As a result I had to reorganize myself considering what to do with the LSG blog. I decided to try to update it with at least one geo-photo post once per week, and with a more insightful contribution at least once per month.

Today’s photo depicts the famous Glarus thrust (near Flims in Switzerland) and will soon be followed by a more detailed report of the late August 5-day field trip in the Swiss Alps, to which I was invited by Prof. T. Nagel (Bonn University).

I will write about the people, the mountain, important outcrops, papers I have read concerning the several problems I was introduce to, etc.

I am planning to do this during the following semester, hopping to be able to interest UL students aiming at organizing a similar field trip in the summer of 2011 or (most probably) 2012.

Let’s see how it works out in view of my dramatic lack of time!

Sunday, June 27, 2010

New header

Following a comment by Silver Fox on my previous post (The amazing geobloggosphere), I have modified the blog header, besides having slightly changed the sequence by which information is displayed. I know I have to do more and better, but right now this was just what I had time to do.


Old LSG header


New LSG header


Could you tell me what do you think of it? Better or worst?


By the way, the slow load difficulties reported by Silver Fox are they general? Does it happens with everybody? (If that is the case, I am really going to try to get some help to quickly solve this. Not being able to look at other pages while this one is loading really sucks!)


I thank everybody  in advance for all incoming opinions.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

The amazing geobloggosphere

Since I have started my (geo)blogging activity several friends and colleagues have insistently asked me why do I blog, and how can I afford loosing the amount of time it involves.

I try to explain them the incredible feeling of having discovered a whole new world.

[A world where one can find Earth-scientists from many different countries, motivated by their passion for what they do geo-related, regardless if it is geochemistry, volcanology, sedimentology, structural geology, seismology, or whatever more.

They are field geologists, industry research employees, college teachers, graduate students, post-docs researchers, university professors, etc.]

Recently, a new (to my knowledge) AGU blog: “The Plainspoken Scientist” has invited several geobloggers to explain just that, i.e.: Why do they blog, and what motivated them in the first place to start doing so.

The first three contributions (Mountain Beltaway, Magma Cum Laude and Clastic Detritus) are really worth reading, and constitute a good summary of reasons, with which I definitely can identify.

Myself, I have created a geoblog after I started to follow Clastic Detritus. I do it because I love geology and I want to enjoy it beyond the realm of the academic institution in which I work.

The opportunity to share thoughts, photos and all kinds of information and experiences related to my professional activity as a geologist with people all over the world who share similar interests, really revealed itself as a source of immense pleasure and fun. And honestly this was (and is) my prime motivation. Divulging geosciences, helping students, getting help on different subjects are all also important but, honestly, they all come second to the pleasure of knowing that there is someone out there – in fact a whole lot of people – who makes some sense of what I do (regardless of their specific opinion about whatever particular topic).

[The lyrics of an old TV-series “Cheers” conveys the feeling in the passage (perhaps better if one substitutes “troubles” by “interests”):

You wanna be where you can see,
our troubles are all the same
You wanna be where everybody knows
Your name.
”] 

Finally I would like to leave a question to the (much more experienced) geobloggers (and to the others): What is the average of visitors per day of your blogs? How did this evolved over time since you have started to blog? How important is this for you guys? I’d love to have your answers on this (delicate?) matter. Thanks.

M5.0 earthquake near OTTAWA, Ontario, Canada

As usual all relevant information can be consulted here.

The USGS tectonic summary talks about reverse-fault reactivation of a previous normal fault of the NW trending Ottawa graben, and explains that earthquakes of this magnitude, although having had occurred in the past, are relatively rare in this area (east of the Rockies), distant from any main tectonic boundary.

The earthquake was relatively shallow (~16km depth) and located only 56km NNE of Ottawa. So I can imagine from my own recent experience that it might have frightened quite a few.

USGS historical record of the largest events in this same area mentions a M6.1earthquake in 1935, and a M6.2 in 1732, respectively to the NW and to the east of the today's location (at a mean distance of ~200km). Only the 1732 earthquake is reported to have caused "significant damage in Montreal".

In my last post I mentioned that I have an aunt living in Toronto (located ~350km to SW of Ottawa), well judging from the project of t-shirt that she sent me only a few hours after the quake (on the left), the inhabitants of this great city sure live up to their high spirits' reputation!

Sunday, June 20, 2010

I am reading… “The Earth After Us – What legacy will humans leave in the rocks?” by Jan Zalasiewicz

Portugal is going through a severe financial and economic crisis. You can read all about it in the press (national and international), and I promise you this post is not about that!

But concerning this subject is very easy to read about the imminent,  fatal catastrophe that will inexorable fall upon all our heads if we don’t behave.

[now I really have to restrain myself from discussing what behave means, from defending the European social security system that the same guys that caused the crisis say is not possible to sustain, etc., etc. … again: this post is not about that!]

It is about what I call the anthropocentric character of all these opinions, i.e., the inability of the vast majority of the well educated opinion makers to remember (or, I suspect, in most cases to realize!) that our species (as has happened with all the others in our planet) within a very brief interval of geological time will almost for sure disappear.

What I mean is that all geologists know that Homo sapiens sapiens will briefly (in geological terms) most probably be extinct.

For those of you non-geologists who are less familiar with geological time, a very small list of dates to trigger your interest (this is a super super summarized list of important events):

- (most) Cosmologists say the Universe started with the Big Bang at 15 000 million years;
- The age of the Earth corresponds closely to one third of that time (4600 million years);
- The first forms of life (prokaryotes) are generally thought to have appeared on the Earth between 3000-4000 million years;
- Multicellular organisms did not exist until ca. 610 million years and;
- Modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens), biped apes with big brains that love to use instruments, are only around since 200 000 years (the lack of the word million after the number is not a mistake!).       

If you’re not a geologist take a break to think about these numbers. Compare 200ky with 100My that corresponds approximately to the time of dominance of dinosaurs on the Earth. Take your time, think about it.

How do you feel? Getting a grip of how hugely insignificant we are in geological terms now? Take it easy we’re not extinct yet, and mean while I recommend the use of a small parcel of the time we have left to read the beautiful book by Jan ZalasiewiczThe Earth After Us – What legacy will humans leave in the rocks” (an offer from an aunt of mine that lives in Toronto, who has paid me a visit in Lisbon a few weeks ago).

(left) - Dr. Jan Zalasiewicz (photo from here)

The book uses, as an excuse to explain the geology of our planet, the premise of an intelligent alien civilization finding Earth one hundred million years from now – i.e. long after our extinction as a species - and their efforts to learn about our planet through reading its history on the rocks.

What impact would we have left? What impression would we have made? What would be our legacy in the eyes of these alien guys?

The book which was first published in 2008 (many of you might have read it already), is not a science fiction book; make no mistake about it. Although its main premise is speculative enough (alien civilization finding our planet, etc.), it functions merely as a pretext to explain with unbelievable simplicity some major concepts of modern geology.

How and why is an important parcel of the history of our planet preserved in the strata? How rare is this compared with other solar system planets? What is plate tectonics, and why does it exist on Earth, and not on Venus or Mars? What are the implications of this for the existence of life? These are all examples of interesting discussed topics, always contemplated with the concern of making sophisticated concepts accessible to everyone with a curious mind: one of the most productive ways to shake the depressive feeling arising from realizing our (nevertheless quite obvious) finitude as a species!
  
[Then again we are the product of thousands of millions of years of evolution. One strange product since in our case, through such an evolution, matter has acquired at least some degree of consciousness of itself, and of its surroundings. There is absolutely no precedent in the history of the Earth (and elsewhere in the Universe?). So maybe, just maybe, this will make a difference, and one hundred million years from now we will be exploring other stars. At least that’s what I like to think about it when I look at my kids]

Friday, June 18, 2010

A bad day of work (thoughts on the war inside your head when you're writing a paper)


(left) – This is me standing next to a poster, during the last GeoMOD meeting (Florence 2008), where I first presented the ideas I am writing about in the paper I am struggling with in the present moment.

Sometimes after an involuntary break (usually some type of bureaucracy) I find it very difficult to resume my work, particularly when I am writing a science paper.

When I am writing, I am constantly reviewing every step of the way inside my head, often taking forever to be reasonably satisfied with one particular way of expressing an idea, or describing an observation. It a harsh, recurrent and instantaneous interior conflict, a constant fight between what I keep expecting to able to do, and the result that in fact I am being able to produce.

I suppose everyone involved in any kind of creative intellectual activity, scientific or artistic, is more or less familiar with this (or similar) tension (ask PhD students writing their thesis and they’ll probably start talking about its potential destructive nature!).

So, when you are submerged within this private battle – often a bitter, vicious one – and you have to interrupt this pungent activity to take care of, for instance, learning the new rules for applying for funding of next semester science projects, as important as this might be (and it is!), it is a totally different world form the one you’ve been inhabiting in your preceding writing moments (minutes, hours?).

It is often such a brutal break that it feels like something is lost inside your brain. The awakening to the mundane world of everyday tasks bears with it the price of not remembering - at least not so well and not as fast - all the tiny details through which we were intending to explain a certain thought. It’s like a certain degree of familiarity, or a certain flavor of a particular important idea is, at least momentarily, lost.

As a result, resuming the writing is difficult. It takes time to regain a certain momentum, and a strong concentration. Sometimes – in what I call bad days of work – I find myself incapable of doing so…

… as in this precise moment (hence I blog!)

My best geology photo

My best geology photo
Carboniferous-Triassic unconformity (SW Portugal, Telheiro beach)

My photos

My Blog List

Blog Archive

Followers

Chess.com


Total Pageviews